Fujitsu collaborates with Indiana University on optical …
We offer several different subscription options to access our news items. The subscriptions are priced based on the included archive access. For ad-hoc news needs or to test our services, we have two one-day subscriptions. The €5 one-day option only allows users to access recent news (no more than 24 hours old) and the login is valid for one day. The €90 subscription also allows you to access our website for 24 hours but includes full archive access. You would be able to access all of Telecompaper’s news stories back to 1993.
In the annual subscription plans, the Light option is ideal for people that regularly log-on to our website or that have RSS feeds set up and basically read the news on a regular basis. If you need to be able to search back further than one month, the Basic, Plus or Unlimited options would be a better choice as they include more extended archive access.
Our Annual News Access subscription options provide access to our website for twelve months, allowing you to read all of the news stories published on our website. We offer four levels of subscriptions with different archive access options: searching news 1 month back, 3 months, 12 months, or unlimited access to the full the archive which dates back to 1993.
With News Access you can browse the news through various news categories or search specifically for subjects that interest you. Our advanced search service further allows you to set up customised RSS feeds based on the search queries. This allows you to track certain companies, for example, and be sure not to miss a thing. We also provide several pre-made RSS feeds and with a News Access subscription you will be able to click through to all these stories.
Only the access plans that allow you to read the current article are displayed below. For the fullrange, click here.
Tags: indiana, news

what the ***** ever.
@jon3k Just because I disagree with the rabid partisan crap being spewed here on a daily basis does not mean I am conservative or representive of the right or left. Over and over again we have people on Digg who are typically rabid in their support for their party keeping repeating the mantra that these leftist comedy shows are real news shows. Even the hosts of these shows joke about this and say were a freaking comedy show. But I am the one who is being called a nut job? LOLI think these guys are hilarious at times but geez, this is getting ridiculous.
Weasel word of the month: “Substantive”.Example: A leftist comedy show is as substantive as the real news.PS.: Reported as inacurate. No matter how much you freaking bastards try to spin and fool people to believe your propaganda, the Dems will still lose because they are now the Party of the Cut and Run.
God bless John Stewart for telling it like it is and making fun of it.
Says more about the decline in quality of traditional news casts than the veracity of the Daily Show. TV news used to feature investigate journalism, now it features stories from the supermarket tabloids.Still, Stewart is much more fun to watch than Couric.
Goes along great with the story about Daily Show viewers being more informed than the average American. Really, it’s a sad state of affairs when people who watch a comedy show for their news know more about what’s going on out there than most. http://www.cnn.com/2004/SHOWBIZ/TV/09/28/comedy.politics/
Here at Osan AB, I watch CNN Asia, and they actually air The Daily Show as part of the CNN programming here! I do find it interesting to compare the news I see on CNN here compared to what my wife gets back stateside. Let’s just say that the CNN channel is totally different outside the US, and actually has a lot more news that is actually newsworthy (instead of some of the fluffy crap you guys have to endure out of Atlanta).
I get all my news from the Daily Show and Digg, partially because both are relatively unbiased and contain lots of sarcasm
It’s so cool to be a liberal these days. I love being ahead of the curve.
…and somehow fittingly, this is only news to people who don’t actually watch The Daily Show.
I find it funny to argue over whether a show is left or right, when the entire purpose of the show is to illuminate the idiocracy behind both stances (Viva la Stewart!)
I wouldn’t be surprised if the Daily Show is more accurate, as well.
Although its an interesting study, lets face it - the Daily Show is, at its core, an entertainment program; whereas the news is supposed to be, well… the news. So its not entirely surprising that the Daily Show was found to be equally as “substantive” as the real news - after all, it’s not supposed to be on the front line of hardcore world issues like we should expect of our traditional news programs. What’s sad is that our “real” news was found to be no more meaty than a Comedy Central entertainment program. That is simply a tragedy.Long live John Stewart. At least with him we’re guaranteed at least *some* impartial reporting of the issues that matter most.
sure it might cover the same news, but the jokes are always an obvius bias that too many people i know take to heart
my favorite Katie “bad reporter” Couric quote was from the day after the Columbine shooting. She was interviewing a student and asked “Is there a particular band that these boys listened to?” Talk about a leading question.