Lisa Heyamoto: Passport won't secure a cool one
As a self-respecting Australian, Ardyn Majere isn’t given to frequent visits to the Outback Steakhouse.
But when a gal wants beer and a steak, a gal wants beer and a steak.
So Majere and her spouse decided to throw principle to the wind and head to the Outback on Laguna. Halfway though her beer order, however, she realized she’d left her California ID card at home.
And after checking with her boss, the waitress said she couldn’t accept the work authorization card Majere offered instead.
Turns out that California is quite strict about which forms of ID it considers legitimate. Rather than list acceptable forms, the state Alcoholic Beverage Control offers a list of requirements: namely, your name, date of birth, picture and – here’s the kicker – a physical description.
Even U.S. passports don’t list your height and weight, nor do a host of other documents that leave tourists and residents alike in the lurch.
“That’s what probably causes the most frustration,” said Matt Seck, ABC’s chief of trade enforcement. “People call and say ‘You’re telling me that I can use my passport to get past homeland security but I can’t get a drink at a bar?’”
Not even, it turns out, at the Outback Steakhouse.
“I thought it was the most hilarious thing I’d ever heard,” Majere, 24, said in an email. “Aussies can’t drink at Outback. What a world.”
Spaz the cat may just be the only creature alive to opt out of a move to Hawaii.
He and his owners were on their way to the Aloha State from North Carolina awhile back when he escaped from a hotel room. He somehow made his way to a Sacramento feral cat colony, where he was picked up recently by the Sacramento SPCA during one of its routine spay/neuter clinics.
Tags: bar, california, state

Last modified: Thu Jul 21 22:15:40 EDT 2005boooo old information booo
If so, then Bob Minton is a total wimp. Tom Cruise scared him off? Get a grip.
Freedom of religion is a freedom given to the people, not to religious organizations. People being held against their will have an inherent right to leave that religion (or to stop following its “religious practices” long enough to cease being held prisoner). To allow a religion to enforce a contract that says that the parishioner must abide by the religion’s rules, even when the person has decided that they no longer wish to do so, removes freedom of religion.
Uhh, no he didn’t. Either way, he’s got an international criminal record. Not a good person to idolize if you’re going to attack a religion.
We’ll stop when the Church of Scientology stops ruining people’s lives, tearing families apart, infiltrating the U.S. government, brainwashing people into giving all of their money, etc.
Freedom from a fascist cult controlling your life.